|
| The Hunchback of Notre Dame (Penguin Popular Classics) | 
enlarge | Author: Victor Hugo Publisher: Penguin Classics Category: Book
List Price: £2.00 Buy Used: £0.01 You Save: £1.99 (100%)
New (36) Collectible (1) from £0.01
Avg. Customer Rating: 9 reviews Sales Rank: 45404
Media: Paperback Edition: New edition Pages: 496 Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.6 Dimensions (in): 7.1 x 4.3 x 0.9
ISBN: 0140622225 EAN: 9780140622225 ASIN: 0140622225
Publication Date: January 25, 2007 Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 4 more reviews...
Heartbreaking October 25, 2007 I have read all the reviews and even the bad ones have a point but this story is one of the best ever written. Yes some chapters are very detailed and you feel like throwing the book out the window but please keep reading and i assure you, you will not be disappointed.
A Masterpiece September 23, 2007 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
In this book Victor Hugo shows the depths of his creativity. Instead of writing a long and complicated story such as 'Les Mis' he wrote this book in the style of a 'Penny Dreadful'. I admit that there are a lot of descriptions of Paris in the Middle Ages but this helps to put the story in context. The characters are believable, even though there are a lot of coincidences, but then again this is a gothic novel. There is no hero as such, the English title being a bit of a misnomer. Quasimodo or the Hunchback as we usually call him is a dumb and disformed character who may be slghtly dysfunctional but shows that he does have emotions and can act more honourably than his peers. Hugo gave us in this a twist on the Beauty and the Beast theme and has obviously influeneced countless authors since, as for instance 'The Phantom of the Opera'. What I like about this book is that Quasimodo, a person who is considered to be below everyone else shows that he is more capable of what are considered to be the highest human attributes and ultimately puts to shame his 'superiors'. It is due to this that the book hasn't aged as much as people suppose, as it is in it's way an attack on bigotry which we still have today.
You need patience.... June 20, 2006 1 out of 4 found this review helpful
The fact that this book is a classic was the only reason I wanted to read it. Unfortunately I didn't manage to get past three chapters of this book, the elaborate and mundane descriptions go on for too long and almost looses it's structure. It's just too descriptive for me. However, if you enjoy that sort of thing read it. But if you want a book that gets straight to the point and has a "tighter" structure, you'd be better off reading something more modern.
hard to get into January 16, 2006 1 out of 5 found this review helpful
starting this book i had such high expectations, afterall it is a classic. it may be something to do with it's translation but i found it unreadable. the description too long winded, the writting style amateurish. i never even got into the main plot line of the story because it was just too much hard work. maybe it gets better after the first few chapters. i don't know i never got that far.
Monumental tragedy June 11, 2005 8 out of 8 found this review helpful
Hugo's Notre-Dame de Paris is usually translated into English as The Hunchback of Notre-Dame, giving the impression that Quasimodo, the hunchback, is the hero of the novel. In truth, this is a story without a true hero or a true villain. The original French title is more apt because the central character is the cathedral itself, overshadowing, shaping and constraining the merely human lives that are played out in and around it. If the story has a villain it is Fate; blind, merciless and unremitting. There is however a heroine, La Esmeralda, and she alone of all the characters makes us laugh and cry.Hugo can be prolix. For what Dickens will say in a sentence, and Dostoevski in a paragraph, Hugo will employ a chapter, when the mood takes him. I hate the idea of abridgements and I would normally never recommend skipping or skimming any part of a great work, but Hugo is a possible exception. The thirty-odd pages devoted to A Bird's Eye View of Paris can be safely skipped over, unless you are a bird. Everything else is essential, or at least worthwhile. Neither does the author skimp on the use of coincidence, and the plot relies on one 'who-should-it-be-but' coincidence in particular which is so convenient and unlikely that most readers will groan when they realize what it is. The charitable interpretation is that the book is after all about Fate and its inevitability. Despite those quibbles, the novel is a resounding 5-star must-read. It is astonishingly imaginative and includes scenes, especially those in the prison, and at the very end, that are as powerful, disturbing and memorable as anything in literature. I will say no more about them, because I hate spoilers even more than I do abridgements. Needless to say, if you think you know the story from movie versions, you don't.
|
|
| Powered by Associate-O-Matic
| |