|
| No Logo | 
enlarge | Author: Naomi Klein Publisher: Flamingo Category: Book
List Price: £14.99 Buy Used: £2.69 You Save: £12.30 (82%)
Collectible (1) from £9.99
Avg. Customer Rating: 14 reviews Sales Rank: 19839
Media: Paperback Pages: 512 Shipping Weight (lbs): 0
ISBN: 0002559196 EAN: 9780002559195 ASIN: 0002559196
Publication Date: January 17, 2000 Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days Condition: Shelf wear; very slight water damage to the top of pages.
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.co.uk Review We live in an era where image is nearly everything, where the proliferation of brand-name culture has created, to take one hyperbolic example from Naomi Klein's No Logo, "walking, talking, life-sized Tommy [Hilfiger] dolls, mummified in fully branded Tommy worlds". Brand identities are even flourishing online, she notes--and for some retailers, perhaps best of all online: "Liberated from the real-world burdens of stores and product manufacturing, these brands are free to soar, less as the disseminators of goods or services than as collective hallucinations".In No Logo, Klein patiently demonstrates, step by step, how brands have become ubiquitous, not just in media and on the street but increasingly in the schools as well. The global companies claim to support diversity but their version of "corporate multiculturalism" is merely intended to create more buying options for consumers. When Klein talks about how easy it is for retailers like Wal-Mart and Blockbuster to "censor" the contents of videotapes and albums, she also considers the role corporate conglomeration plays in the process. How much would one expect Paramount Pictures, for example, to protest against Blockbuster's policies, given that they are both divisions of Viacom? Klein also looks at the workers who keep these companies running, most of whom never share in any of the great rewards. The president of Borders, when asked whether the bookstore chain could pay its clerks a "living wage" wrote that "while the concept is romantically appealing, it ignores the practicalities and realities of our business environment". Those clerks should probably just be grateful they're not stuck in an Asian sweatshop, making pennies an hour to produce Nike sneakers or other must-have fashion items. Klein also discusses at some length the tactic of hiring "permatemps" who can do most of the work and receive few, if any, benefits like health care, paid vacations or stock options. While many workers are glad to be part of the "Free Agent Nation" observers note that, particularly in the high-tech industry, such policies make it increasingly difficult to organise workers and advocate for change. But resistance is growing and the backlash against the brands has set in. Street-level education programmes have taught kids in the inner cities, for example, not only about Nike's abusive labour practices but about the astronomical mark-up in their prices. Boycotts have commenced: as one urban teen put it, "Nike, we made you. We can break you". But there's more to the revolution, as Klein optimistically recounts: "Ethical shareholders, culture jammers, street reclaimers, McUnion organisers, human-rights hacktivists, school-logo fighters and Internet corporate watchdogs are at the early stages of demanding a citizen-centred alternative to the international rule of the brands ... as global, and as capable of co-ordinated action, as the multinational corporations it seeks to subvert". No Logo is a comprehensive account of what the global economy has wrought and the actions taking place to thwart it. --Ron Hogan
Amazon.co.uk Review We live in an era where image is nearly everything, where the proliferation of brand-name culture has created, to take one hyperbolic example from Naomi Klein's No Logo, "walking, talking, life-sized Tommy [Hilfiger] dolls, mummified in fully branded Tommy worlds". Brand identities are even flourishing online, she notes--and for some retailers, perhaps best of all online: "Liberated from the real-world burdens of stores and product manufacturing, these brands are free to soar, less as the disseminators of goods or services than as collective hallucinations." In No Logo, Klein patiently demonstrates, step by step, how brands have become ubiquitous, not just in media and on the street but increasingly in the schools as well. The global companies claim to support diversity but their version of "corporate multiculturalism" is merely intended to create more buying options for consumers. When Klein talks about how easy it is for retailers like Wal-Mart and Blockbuster to "censor" the contents of videotapes and albums, she also considers the role corporate conglomeration plays in the process. How much would one expect Paramount Pictures, for example, to protest against Blockbuster's policies, given that they're both divisions of Viacom? Klein also looks at the workers who keep these companies running, most of whom never share in any of the great rewards. The president of Borders, when asked whether the bookstore chain could pay its clerks a "living wage" wrote that "while the concept is romantically appealing, it ignores the practicalities and realities of our business environment." Those clerks should probably just be grateful they're not stuck in an Asian sweatshop, making pennies an hour to produce Nike sneakers or other must-have fashion items. Klein also discusses at some length the tactic of hiring "permatemps" who can do most of the work and receive few, if any, benefits like health care, paid vacations or stock options. While many workers are glad to be part of the "Free Agent Nation" observers note that, particularly in the high-tech industry, such policies make it increasingly difficult to organise workers and advocate for change. But resistance is growing and the backlash against the brands has set in. Street-level education programmes have taught kids in the inner cities, for example, not only about Nike's abusive labour practices but about the astronomical mark-up in their prices. Boycotts have commenced: as one urban teen put it, "Nike, we made you. We can break you." But there's more to the revolution, as Klein optimistically recounts: "Ethical shareholders, culture jammers, street reclaimers, McUnion organisers, human-rights hacktivists, school-logo fighters and Internet corporate watchdogs are at the early stages of demanding a citizen-centred alternative to the international rule of the brands ... as global, and as capable of co-ordinated action, as the multinational corporations it seeks to subvert." No Logo is a comprehensive account of what the global economy has wrought and the actions taking place to thwart it. --Ron Hogan
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 9 more reviews...
Timely but frustratingly repetitive and tediously anecdotal March 18, 2001 3 out of 3 found this review helpful
An interesting work but one largely assembled from layers of anecdotes glued together by elementary political analysis. There is a keen political analysis trying to get out,on the damaging effects of the globalisation of production on producers and consumers, but it is swamped by the torrent of anecdotes about one brand or another. The major narrative weakness of the work is that it struggles to rise above an almost fetishistic savouring of this or that particular anecdote, with the result that profund political abstraction is lacking. Only so many anecdotes are neccessary to make the point about Nike, McDonalds, etc. The book's style hasn't grasped this point and often one has to plough through blocks of fifty pages (all of which have the ring of 'haven't I just read that earlier')to get to a new insight or piece of speculative analysis. The 'journalistic' expression lends itself to a shorter more focussed work which would have been of much greater value to the very important debate over the changing shape of globalisation. One could marry a much shorter version with texts from the works of C. Wright Mills, Marcuse and Habermas to develop a relatively complete political analysis. A timely work yes, but badly in need of intense editing.
Absolutely blown away...can't put the book down! March 14, 2001 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
This book uncovers some problems in society not unveiled through public media. I am absolutely blown away with example after example of corporate America focusing solely on private profit over people and society. If you want to get a feeling of the voice that will be loud and clear for years to come, this is it...
We're not doing enough March 13, 2001 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
A well-researched and questioning book. Having fought McDonald's inappropriate land development plans in my local community (and won) - but also encountering some of the behavioural characteristics of global companies that Naomi Klein cites in her book - I thought I was doing well for community interests. This book made me realise that none of us are doing enough.
Flawed, PC Agenda in new packaging February 19, 2001 0 out of 2 found this review helpful
Disappointing, over-hyped book by Naomi Klein which has become the de rigueur fashion accessory of every person concerned about human rights and the spread of "globalization" while obsessing about showing off their vacation photographs taken in MacDonald's in Beijing without their friends finding out. There's nothing new in this book. It begs more questions about the author's methodology than it provides answers about its supposed subject matter. To quote the brilliant Irish writer Brendan Behan (when he spoke about Canada) in this instance: "it'll be great when it's finished". Intellectually, the book is very poor, assembled with flawed intellectual rigor. Some facts don't add up. Some are just wrong. Some oversights are unbelievable! How can a 1987 table of corporate tax take as percentage of the total US federal revenue provide a measure for 1998 (see table 2.1)? Klein ignores how branding was essentially a monopolistic activity from the 19th Century (read the "Political Economy of Innovation" by Bill Kingston) and not the product of the Reagan/Thatcher free market enterprise conspiracy. Her claim that the demand for tech workers in the US has led to tech investment in rich schools at the expense of poor ones is false. Why all the H1B visas issued for foreign workers by the U.S. if that is the case? Furthermore, Microsoft does NOT use temps to shield core workers, as she claims. Temps are used in areas that are not core competencies (catering, documentation production, graphic design, etc.). Microsoft, according to Bill Gates, is a development organization with a marketing front end. And what is unusual about specialization and division of labor in this day and age anyway? Tony Blair's "Cool Britannia" is now a post-dinner party discussion nightmare of cronyism, back-handers, and ineptitude, like an embarrassing menopausal uncle trying to appear hip by talking about Ecstasy. Finally, If branding is that powerful, how about the demise of the dot com culture based which was entirely on image? Could it be that these dot coms had no products and services, and really that's what people like about Microsoft, MacD's, Starbucks and Nike - they want their stuff? These are all conveniently ignored. Klein's solution to the brand bullies based on culture "jamming", without mentioning that these saviors are themselves little more that PC bullies in their own right who suffer badly from guilt and who have ideological agendas to peddle of their own. There is not a single Billboard Liberation Front "jamming" of Noah's Bagels "Cultural" advertisements at a time when the Intifada rages in the Middle East for example. Why not? Susan Sontag in her 1964 essay "Notes on Camp" really gives a clue to this book's essential character defect- basically if you have to talk about a subject this much, then you don't really relate to it. "The real guilt of Political Correctness is not its imposed intolerance or rigidity, but that it is not political enough - that it is impersonating political struggle" wrote Tim Brennan of S.U.N.Y. in 1971. Klein's "No Logo" suffers from a worse malady - impersonating intellectualism.
Takes the pulse of the anti-brand movement February 19, 2001 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Naomi Klein is on the bleeding edge of the anti-brand backlash. No Logo provides a fascinating profile of contemporary, left-wing thought on the role of brands in society. Her story-telling, backed by mountains of anecdote, is stronger than her grasp of economic theory, but she never fails to challenge and question. Brand marketing professionals should read this book, if they have the guts. Along with Brands in the Balance -- the new survey of branding from Kevin Drawbaugh that takes a more business-oriented perspective -- No Logo will bring you up to speed on the serious issues confronting brands that no one wants to mention around the conference room table.
|
|
| Powered by Associate-O-Matic
| |