|
| Human Traces | 
 enlarge | Author: Sebastian Faulks
Publisher: Hutchinson
Category: Book
List Price: £17.99
Buy Used: £0.01
You Save: £17.98 (100%)
New (22) Collectible (7) from £1.98
Avg. Customer Rating:  64 reviews
Sales Rank: 167307
Media: Hardcover
Pages: 384
Shipping Weight (lbs): 2.3
Dimensions (in): 9.2 x 6.5 x 2.2
ISBN: 0091794552
EAN: 9780091794552
ASIN: 0091794552
Publication Date: August 29, 2005
Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days
Condition: Acceptable. SKU D40091794552. All our items are NEW & UNREAD - but with some minor damage.. Items cover and some internal pages are likely to have sustained some damage, but will be readable.
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 59 more reviews...
 Human Traces September 26, 2008
Sebastian Faulks's epic work from 2005 spans more than 600 pages in the hardback edition. Its scope is vast, and its ambition - to recap the advances and recreate the excitement of psychiatric innovations in the late 19th and early 20th Centuries, all within the boundaries of a credible work of fiction - is enormous. Yet Faulks pulls this monumental task off with astonishing skill, creating a novel that both informs and fascinates.
The story starts in 1876 in Breton, France, where an inquisitive 16 year-old, Jacques Rebiere, dissects small animals clandestinely in his bedroom, away from the prying eyes and disapproval of his strict father and disinterested stepmother. Jacques comes from a dysfunctional family - his mother died shortly after his birth, and his older brother Olivier is a schizophrenic - a condition which at that time was steeped in mistrust and fear.
Across the sea in England, Thomas Midwinter is also 16 that year. He comes from a very different family environment. His parents love him, he has a doting older sister Sonia, and his days are spent in boyish japes and reading his beloved Shakespeare.
The story follows the path of these two individuals and their families as both boys study medicine, develop an interest in the then fledgling specialty psychiatry, meet, and make plans to work together. As they follow their chosen careers, the reader is given an insight into the appalling conditions in most psychiatric hospitals in the 19th Century. Decent, altrusitic, kind doctors existed but ignorance and suspicion meant that efforts to treat the insane with humanity were still in their infancy.
Faulks has obviously carried out a huge amount of research into the history of psychiatry and neurology for this amazingly accomplished novel. Theories of the experts and luminaries of the day - Charcot, Babinski, Tourette, Janet, Freud - are outlined in way that rarely seems forced. It is a very difficult task to drop these theories into a work of fiction without seeming to push unnatural sounding speeches into the fictional characters' mouths, but Faulks manages this with aplomb: apart from a couple of lectures given by the characters - which are both highly plausible as lectures recapping current knowledge - the rest of the work is explained in natural-sounding dialogue between Thomas, Jacques, their wives and their colleagues.
But there is much more to this novel than the history of diseases of the mind. Thomas is fascinated by the work of Charles Darwin, and the gradual acceptance by intelligent people of natural selection is shown elegantly, together with some of the evidence Darwin cited. In addition, Faulks uses his knowledge of the first world war - seen so poignantly in his earlier work Birdsong - to paint a vivid and disturbing picture of political events and to bring the life of one of the characters to painful life.
The prose is as muscular and elegant as one would expect from Faulks. Characters are for the main part beautifully rich and complex, although a slight excess of minor characters may have contributed to Sonia, Jacques' wife, and Kitty, Thomas's wife, being somewhat interchangeable as loyal, intelligent, articulate women.
There are only a couple of areas with which I have quibbles. Having discussed the evidence for evolution so carefully and shown the mistrust with which a theory proposing the absence of a divine creator was initially received, I found it a shame that in two parts, Faulks falls back on inexplicable 'supernatural' phenomena. One is when Jacques visits a medium - although he later says he believed her to be a charlatan, the picture Faulks presents of the scene at the medium's house is disappointingly full of seemingly psychic phenomena. If this happened in any other novel, the reader could simply note the US sceptic Randi, whose offer to pay a million dollars to anyone displaying unequivocal and repeatable evidence of psychic gifts remains an unclaimed prize - testimony to the rational sceptic's view of the world. But for Faulks to include this scene when he has spent 600 pages building up the case for science as opposed to the spiritual world is jarringly annoying, it negates much of the work he has done in elevating the world of evidence-based science. The other scene which disappointed for the same reason was one in which Sonia calmly sees a ghost - again, a ridiculous proposition and almost like a cowardly sop to those offended by the overtly scientific basis of the book until that point.
One other minor point - Thomas is said from the start to hear a benign voice in his head as a child and young man. This later comes in handy to back up his own theory of the evolution of the brain, one that has, in real life, been suggested by some individuals in the past. To a doctor who has an interest in psychiatry, the hearing of 'benign' voices by non schizophrenic individuals sounds highly implausible, and giving the rational Thomas this bizarre and inexplicable quirk only so that he can back up a little known and dubious view of the evolution of the brain seems a mistake.
Still, the overriding feel of the book is of a fascinating and compelling novel casting a searchlight into the darkest recesses of the human mind and asking some of the most profound questions about man's existence and consciousness.
 Long-winded and patchy July 8, 2008
I have been an admirer of the writing of Sebastian Faulks and am interested in the history of management of mental illness but this book stretched one's loyalty to the limits. There are long passages where I can hardly believe Faulks is the author; passages of 'he said to her and she replied to him' sort of dialogue, which are totally lacking in any literary merit. It would have benefitted from the wielding of a ruthless editorial scalpel.
 So disappointed after Birdsong June 30, 2008
2 out of 2 found this review helpful
Like many people I was enthralled by Birdsong, and hurried out to buy more work by Faulks. Human Traces however, proved to be a huge disappointment to me. The prose is still wonderful, and the book does give some fascinating insights into advances in psychology in the late 1800's/early 1900's- but please, half way through the book I was still looking for a plot and hoping for the single piece of drama that might keep my interest. It never materialised and I have to say I never finished the book- it is very rare that I will not read a book to completion, but I really felt I was wasting my time.
An epic tale June 22, 2008
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
Sebastian Faulks' other novels already told us that he can write about human motives and feelings with depth and clarity. Human traces adds in extra layers - much like the old classics. This is a tightly interwoven piece about the lives of several people with several strong themes running through it i.e. what is madness and how should it be treated, what does it mean to be human? Personally, I found this book an amazingly ambitious project which Faulks has pulled off brilliantly. Then again, I am interested in many of topics covered by the book: the human mind, psychiatry, psychoanalysis, fossil study etc. It's not an easy read if you want your novels to be purely character or plot-driven but I found it to be one of the most outstanding novels I have ever read.
 Fascinating but overly-done June 16, 2008
This was a very complex book about a very complex subject. Neurology can fill whole volumes and still never be properly explored - I work for a medical publisher and we publish whole series of books on neurology and still the subject is not exhausted! The history of the subject is indeed fascinating and I liked the characters in the book, but to me they were still not quite fleshed out enough - they seemed rather two-dimensional. The long lectures that are delivered verbatim were pretty boring and not really necessary to the plot; they merely served to show the author's exhaustive research - which was very impressive certainly. Somehow the whole book just did not gel for me - I find Faulks' works difficult to get into at the best of times. The most action came towards the end where he did rather rush to finish things off neatly which was a shame as he could have cut the book by at least a third and upped the pace a lot more. The most interesting bit for me was the bit in the desert about the footprints and Daniel's thoughts on the speech patterns and voices - that was really interesting and thought-provoking.
However, on the whole this book did not work for me and was really just too long and drawn out to be satisfactory.
|
|
|
Powered by Associate-O-Matic
| |
