|
| Titanic [1998] | ![Titanic [1998]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/5158YK3C0JL._SL160_.jpg)
enlarge | Director: James Cameron Actors: Leonardo Dicaprio, Kate Winslet, Billy Zane, Kathy Bates, Frances Fisher Studio: 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment Category: DVD
List Price: £5.99 Buy Used: £2.49 You Save: £3.50 (58%)
New (23) from £3.08
Avg. Customer Rating: 98 reviews Sales Rank: 821
Format: Full Screen, Pal, Widescreen Languages: English (Original Language), English (Subtitles For The Hearing Impaired), English (Subtitled), Portuguese (Subtitled), Swedish (Subtitled), Danish (Subtitled), Hungarian (Subtitled), Polish (Subtitled), Icelandic (Subtitled), Dutch (Subtitled), Finnish (Subtitled), Czech (Subtitled), Greek (Subtitled) Rating: Suitable for 12 years and over Running Time: 189 minutes Number Of Items: 1 Discs: 1 Aspect Ratio: 1.33:1 Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.2 Dimensions (in): 7.1 x 5.4 x 0.6
EAN: 5039036000147 ASIN: B00004CZDS
Theatrical Release Date: December 19, 1997 Release Date: March 1, 2004 Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days
|
| Customer Reviews:
Insensitive April 22, 2008 6 out of 11 found this review helpful
The worst winner of the Best film is TITANIC 1997. I stopped taking the Oscars seriously after that. It's says alot about Hollywood in that it recast a film about one of the greatest disasters of the C20th as an upstairs/downstairs love story. Imagine the film as a 9/11 climaxing with 2 lovers leaping to their deaths hand in hand from the Twin Towers as Celine Dion squawks away in the background like a Banshee. Wretched, kitsch and expensively so at 200 million, but it went on to make 1 billion world wide due mainly to young dumb females attending this visual garbage multiple times (eg. my ex-girlfriend Emily).
The Titanic disaster was a very black day in British/American History. Over twelve hundred people died horrible freezing deaths in the middle of the Atlantic, but never fear! I am sure they will be smiling down from their clouds on the fact that their demise has been turned into a cheesy Hollywood love story! Well at least they did not die in vain.
Greastest film ever? not by a long stretch. April 11, 2008 2 out of 7 found this review helpful
Just the other day i was reading the paper and a small article in the bottom corner of one page caught my eye. the article in brief said that a sample of 6000 people voted titanic the greatest film ever made. Im prity sure that my jaw dropped far enough to hit myself in the crotch "Greatest film ever!!!!!" At first i proclaimed the vast majority of the cinema going public complete morons. Titanic was the only film i could remember wishing i hadnt watched, and ive seen LXG and didnt hate it! But eventually i came round to the thought that maybe ive been too hard on this film all these years. At the time i went to see this film with a friend of mine who for some reason wanted to see it because he had a fixation with the titanic i think, but i kind of wish i had gone with a girl at least then i might have gotten some action for my troubles. Anyways yesturday i gave the film another go and its not as bad as i remembed it being but likes saying a reliant robbin is not as slow as walking, it still one turkey of film.
Story and script: this is probably the worst part of the movie, the real tragedy is pushed to the back to become nothing more then setting, onto witch they piled a nasty ham sandwich of a love story. The lines are terrble as are the jokes based on peoples ignorance "somthing picasso, he'll never amount to anything" (wow thats bad) i cringed so baddly most of the way through this terrible script.
Cast and acting: They assembled a quality cast in fairness but im not sure they really took it seriously (probably saw the script and thought it was a comedy)infact the only decent piece of acting was from the guys in the submarine at the begining which include bill paxton of aliens fame ("the're coming out of the walls man!!" superior stuff).
Set peices and costume design: Fianlly someone did their job right! the sets and costumes are convinsing throughout the cars were a nice token as well (even is they were only as props for the, funniest, most unneccisary sex scene ever filmed).
Special Effects: Pritty good but at the time i remember thinking that there was something wrong with them, something unconvincing, but i have never been able to put my finger on it.
Additional comments: Every trick in the book was pulled out at the end to produce an emotional response and for me at least every one failed. if they had left it with just the parts with the band playing right up to the end and the captain locking himself in the bridge in may have been ok, as these where decent scenes. But the old couple on the bed and the women tucking her children into bed are just underhanded as they have no part in the plot. some people (mostly the ladys) will say that this is because im an insensitive man. Not true; I cried watching Bridge to Terabithia! and im man enough to say that. another thing is the shot of the man falling off the back and hitting the propeller, it could only have been put in to get cheap laughs (which if i remember rightly it did) its still tastless.
In conclusion, is it the worst film ive ever seen, no, that privalige probably falls to Flight of Fury (steven siegal at his worst) but this is still a smoldering turd of a film. It contains some simple lessons for film makers "good special effects a film Duth not make" you start with script, acting and storyline and work your way out. Probably the worst movie per /$ ever made. 1 star take it out of my sight!
A Mixture Of Good And Bad March 31, 2008 2 out of 2 found this review helpful
I felt this movie had a lot of good points, and equally a number of bad ones. I'll start off with the good. I thought that the special effects were fantastic, particularly the scenes where the ship was sinking. I thought that they got the layout of the ship very accurate, and you could really sense the 'newness', freshness and splendor of this ship on its maiden voyage. It certainly had a feel of 1912 about it.
Now the bad points. I felt the love story of Jack and Rose was awful, and highly improbable, particularly for the times. Their dialogue is really poor, and almost cringeworthy at times! The way they act, and talk, just does not ring true for 1912. Also, the mystery ship seen in the distance by officers and passengers, during the sinking, widely believed to be a tramp steamer, called the 'Californian', does not rate a mention in the movie. This is an important part of the 'Titanic' story, that has been omitted.
I felt this movie was to a certain extent a wasted opportunity. A Night To Remember, is for me, still the definitive 'Titanic' movie.
What a load of rubbish - some Amazon reviewers....... March 27, 2008 2 out of 3 found this review helpful
Look - if you've seen it then fine and if you haven't then nothing I'm gonna say will make you watch it, but.................
I clearly am one of the 42 people in the world that like this film. Given that it took billions and billions of dollars / pounds / whatever - it seems clear that me and the other 41 went to see this film several millions times each.
That some of the dialogue is a bit ropey clearly shows how James Cameron can't do that piece at all and we should slam him for that. Critical we apply double standards to e.g. George Lucas and even Peter Jackson because after all whether it's cool/fashionable or not to like something it much more important than anything of substance.
We obviously must blow apart some of the "quotes" as being utterly crass and obvious even though they are recorded historical fact.
We certainly need to start a campaign to execute Cmeron because that bit from 167 minutes to 169 minutes is actually fiction and that person didn't do that in real life. After all this is the first time ever that a "tue life story" has veered away from being 100% accurate. We certainly shouldn't give Cameron any credit at all for the fact that 90% of the film is frankly obsessively accurate to historical fact.
............. Was "best picture" an injustice? If we really want to talk about rubbish lets cover Forrest Gump and Shawshank Redemption.
So it's great to write about "Worst film ever made" but frankly that merely shows up a review as being "tabloid" knee jerk ignorant nonsense. Titanic is not the best film ever made by a long chalk. It has faults but as a spectacle and in its scale it is breathtaking and well worth watching at least once. For those who feel its the worst film ever made then get out more and watch some films. Clearly you haven't up to now.
Brilliant March 4, 2008 2 out of 4 found this review helpful
They just don't make epic movies like this anymore. Since titanic, braveheart and gladiator we've really been lacking in the 'epic' movie genre. The cinemas really are spurting out 90% crap at the moment - i know because i see a lot of movies there. What is there to say about titanic? Brilliant movie, fab acting, amazing effects and a beautiful story. I know the main story is fiction but i love the detail put into the recreation of the ship to make it look authentic, and all the little true stories and characters they've put into the film. Its just a great film to watch, and if you haven't seen it, its a movie you just HAVE to see. I am always astounded when people have reviewed this movie badly, but alas there are always going to be people who hate a movie, but thats their loss. I stand that this is one of the greatest movies ever made.
|
|
| Powered by Associate-O-Matic
| |